tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2342387949742367554.post655432277864586557..comments2014-09-10T17:49:40.506-04:00Comments on EsabaCZ's Pontificating Publications: Primary AbsurdityEsaba[CZ]http://www.blogger.com/profile/10869315030848796923noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2342387949742367554.post-70097685554889193182008-01-31T20:10:00.000-05:002008-01-31T20:10:00.000-05:00I can agree with this. I have been saying the sam...I can agree with this. I have been saying the same thing for awhile, abeit, for slightly different reasons. I agree that we have the technology to do it all at once these days, so we should. I also agree with News stations giving candidates a certain amount of air time above important stories because they are supposed to be unbiased, and that way how much money is backing their campaign might also be stunted a bit and focus would remain on the candidates. I am not saying candidates can't spend money on their campaign, but if you only have so much air time, you might spend a bit more letting people know what your policies are and less about slamming the others,or you may choose to waste peoples time and do the opposite.<BR/>Sadly, I doubt that would make people any more informed. It seems everyone is so caught up in the first woman/black man, war in Iraq, etc... that alot of people aren't focusing on their other big important factors like economic policies, foreign relations, gun control, etc... For now, I will just try not to let myself be swayed by what everyone else is doing.Houstonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12812744920818541959noreply@blogger.com